Multi-perspective deliberation
Sentinel chairs the governance process. Relevant specialists join based on the case. Evidence is reviewed, disagreement is recorded, and a balanced recommendation is prepared for accountable human decision.
DELIBERATION FLOW
GOVERNANCE CASE · DEMONSTRATION
AI-Assisted Recruitment Shortlisting
Northstar Public Services · Demonstration Organisation
Demonstration Data — Not a Live Client Assessment. Structured governance perspectives generated within the Sentinel prototype.
COUNCIL PERSPECTIVES
Legal Perspective
DissentQUESTION EXAMINED
Does the organisation have legal authority to use AI in this context? Are there statutory obligations or prohibitions?
EVIDENCE CONSIDERED
Employment legislation, data protection law, sector-specific regulation
KEY CONCERN
No documented legal basis for automated shortlisting. Candidate notification obligations unclear.
RECOMMENDED CONTROL
Obtain legal opinion on lawful basis. Document compliance with employment law.
CONFIDENCE:
MediumFINAL PANEL SUMMARY
POINTS OF AGREEMENT
Human review required before any rejection
Candidate transparency notice is mandatory
Named accountable executive must be assigned
DISSENTING CONCERNS
No legal basis documented for automated shortlisting
DPIA not completed — privacy risk unresolved
Independent bias assessment not commissioned
MISSING EVIDENCE
Fairness testing results
Data Protection Impact Assessment
Legal basis documentation
Candidate notification template
RECOMMENDED OUTCOME
Escalate
Proceed only after mandatory controls are implemented and independently reviewed. Human decision required.